Review of literatures Pathophysiology of dentine hypersensitivity

บทความ

Review of literatures: Pathophysiology of dentine hypersensitivity

 

Introduction

            Dentine hypersensitivity is an ordinary oral sensation including pain, sensitivity. The dentine hypersensitivity affects quality of life such as difficult to eating, sensitive to cold or hot water, and psychological condition (1, 2). The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity is ranged from 3 to 57 % depending on the subjective patients’ concerning and study sample (3).

Physiology of disease: dentine hypersensitivity

          Hypersensitivity of teeth is a pain sensation. This pain sensation is a sharp, shooting pain (4).  Hypersensitivity indicates an abnormal pain sensation evoked by innocuous and noxious stimuli (5). The innocuous stimulus is a stimulus that is evoked by touch and air-flow. The airflow can evoke a pain sensation from prolonged or excessive stimuli. Noxious stimuli such as cold water and hypertonic solution can stimulate dentine hypersensitivity. Examples of oral diseases that cause dentine hypersensitivity are tooth surface loss and periodontal disease (6). However, dental caries, pulpitis, or defected restoration are not classified as dentine hypersensitivity (7-9).

          The pathophysiology of dentine hypersensitivity is associated with the anatomy of dentine. Dentine is a particularized calcified mineral connective tissue that covered with enamel and cementum. Dentine and pulp tissue complex are responsible for nutrition and sensory function such as protect and against response to stimulus in the teeth.  The dentine contains specialized cells called odontoblasts. The odontoblasts are columnar cells that originating from neural crest cells. An extension of the odontoblasts is called odontoblast process or also called Tomes's fibers. The dentinal tubule contains an odontoblast cell process and free nerve ending nociceptive receptors (10) The free nerve ending plays a role in the transduction pain mechanisms (11).

            The proposed theories for dentine hypersensitivity are the odontoblastic, nerve and hydrodynamic theories (12). For the odontoblastic theory, odontoblastic processes are exposed on the dentine surface. The exposed dentine surface can be stimulated by chemical and mechanical stimuli. For the nerve theory, the presence of unmyelinated nerve fibers and neurogenic peptides at the odontoblast process receive external stimuli leading to the development of dentine hypersensitivity (13, 14). Nowadays, the hydrodynamic theory is proved by Brännström and mostly supported dentine hypersensitivity. The changes in fluid movement are caused by physical changes such as thermal stimulus, mechanical stimulus, and osmotic changes. All of the stimulations cause the movement of dentinal fluid and consequence to stimulate a physiological detector in the odontoblast. This process leads to a neural discharge response to pain signaling (15, 16).

          However, the nerve theory and odontoblastic theory are associated with hydrodynamic theory. The proposed mechanisms of three theories cannot be distinguish (14). The behind mechanisms of these theories are the presence of nerves and odontoblastic process within the dentinal tubules, bathing in the dentinal fluid, and also odontoblasts are close apposition subodontoblastic plexus. Therefore, the fluid movement can stimulate the ion channels, present in the nerve ending innervation and the odontoblast in the dentinal tubule, that causes pain transduction.

          Therefore, the opening in the dentinal tubules and exposure of dentine are main causes for the development of dentine hypersensitivity (2, 7, 15, 17, 18). First, the opening of tubules are caused by the loss of smear layer and enamel (19). Normally, the smear layer is a physical barrier that declines a penetration of external environment into dentinal tubules (20). However, a smear layer which is a thin structure (thickness of smear layer around 1- to 2-µm) covered of dentinal tubules (21). The loss of smear layer is caused by improper brushing, tooth surface loss and scaling and root planning debridement. The loss of the smear layer might cause an activated dentine permeability. The increased dentine permeability causes an elevated movement of dentinal fluid. An elevated movement of dentinal fluid generates an initiated action potential at the free nerve ending which develops pain hypersensitivity (22). Secondly, the sensitized dentine exposure causes a stimulated free nerve ending innervated odontoblast in dentinal tubule. The odontoblasts are developed receptor potentials and consequently the generation of action potential pass through the trigeminal pain system (23)

          Moreover, the pathology of dentine hypersensitivity might depend on the size of exposed dentinal tubule. The recent review found that a sensitive tooth has a greater number of open tubules per unit area when compared to a nonsensitive teeth (17, 24). The flow of fluid movement relies on the radius of dentinal tubules which is approximately the biquadrate of a radius of tubules (25). The mean diameter’s tubules in sensitive teeth is approximately twice large when compared to nonsensitive teeth (26). Therefore, the fluid flow in tubules of sensitive teeth should be 16 times when compared to the nonsensitive teeth (27).

Figure 1: Focus on pathophysiology of dentine hypersensitivity  

Conclusion

           Sharp or sudden pain is the main symptom of dentine hypersensitivity in the teeth. This symptom is initiated by activated noxious stimuli. Pathophysiology of dentine hypersensitivity involves in exposed dentine and opening of dentinal tubules. The opening of dentinal tubules causes a response immune system that produces odontoblasts and changes the dentinal fluid. Repetitive external stimuli and the opening of dentinal tubules lead to the augmented pain action potential and the development of dentine hypersensitivity.


เอกสารอ้างอิง

References

1.         Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: New perspectives on an old problem. International Dental Journal. 2002;52(S5P2):367-75.

2.         Addy M, Pearce N. Aetiological, predisposing and environmental factors in dentine hypersensitivity. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39 Suppl:33s-8s.

3.         Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(7):990-8; quiz 1028-9.

4.         Idon PI, Sotunde OA, Ogundare TO. Beyond the Relief of Pain: Dentin Hypersensitivity and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. Front Dent. 2019;16(5):325-34.

5.         Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Vitor GP, Silveira JO, Martins CC, Costa FO, Cota LOM. Effect of dentin hypersensitivity treatment on oral health related quality of life - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018;71:1-8.

6.         Tugnait A, Clerehugh V. Gingival recession-its significance and management. J Dent. 2001;29(6):381-94.

7.         Addy M, Urquhart E. Dentine hypersensitivity: its prevalence, aetiology and clinical management. Dent Update. 1992;19(10):407-8, 10-2.

8.         Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14(5):280-4.

9.         Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity. The development and evaluation of a replica technique to study sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol. 1989;16(3):190-5.

10.       Gunji T. Morphological research on the sensitivity of dentin. Arch Histol Jpn. 1982;45(1):45-67.

11.       Longridge NN, Youngson CC. Dental Pain: Dentine Sensitivity, Hypersensitivity and Cracked Tooth Syndrome. Primary Dental Journal. 2019;8(1):44-51.

12.       Felix J, Ouanounou A. Dentin Hypersensitivity: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2019;40(10):653-7; quiz 8.

13.       Mason S, Young S, Araga M, Butler A, Lucas R, Milleman JL, et al. Stain control with two experimental dentin hypersensitivity toothpastes containing spherical silica: a randomised, early-phase development study. BDJ Open. 2019;5:8.

14.       West N, Seong J, Davies M. Dentine hypersensitivity. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:108-22.

15.       Dowell P, Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity--a review. Aetiology, symptoms and theories of pain production. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10(4):341-50.

16.       Brannstrom M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain: sensation in preparations, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod. 1986;12(10):453-7.

17.       Krauser JT. Hypersensitive teeth. Part I: Etiology. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56(2):153-6.

18.       Collaert B, Fischer C. Dentine hypersensitivity: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991;7(4):145-52.

19.       Zero DT, Lussi A. Erosion--chemical and biological factors of importance to the dental practitioner. Int Dent J. 2005;55(4 Suppl 1):285-90.

20.       Pashley DH. Smear layer: overview of structure and function. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1992;88 Suppl 1:215-24.

21.       Van Landuyt K, Munck J, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding to Dentin: Smear Layer and the Process of Hybridization. Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding: Interfacial Phenomena and Related Properties. 2005:89-122.

22.       Cummins D. Recent advances in dentin hypersensitivity: clinically proven treatments for instant and lasting sensitivity relief. Am J Dent. 2010;23 Spec No A:3a-13a.

23.       Walters PA. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6(2):107-17.

24.       Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endod. 1986;12(10):465-74.

25.       Miglani S, Aggarwal V, Ahuja B. Dentin hypersensitivity: Recent trends in management. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):218-24.

26.       Mantzourani M, Sharma D. Dentine sensitivity: past, present and future. J Dent. 2013;41 Suppl 4:S3-17.

27.       Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(4):221-6.


ผู้เขียน/ผู้จัดทำ

ทพ.ณัฐพล โรจน์เพ็ญเพียร

แบบทดสอบ